I hope you are enjoying this month of terms that mystery and
crime fiction writers might need for their stories. It’s hard to believe there
are only a few letters left to uncover!
Undercover is a
favorite staple of mystery and crime fiction writers. These operations are more
likely to occur in police procedurals than in cozies, but being a cozy doesn’t
obviate the possibility. Undercover
operations are used to obtain insider information that is not possible to
obtain through normal surveillance or questioning techniques.
The first undercover
agents were used in France in 1811 by VidocQ. In England, Sir Robert Peel
instituted a plainclothes unit in 1829. Though I have no evidence, I suggest
it’s possible that the unofficial and sporadic use of officers as undercover agents predated these
formalized units.
An undercover
agent typically assumes a disguise of appearance or identity in order to gain
the trust of suspects and/or their organization. From within the organization,
the undercover agent gathers
evidence and confidential information to build a case.
Undercover agents
separate themselves from their normal lives and live within the structure they
are observing. They can’t carry police credentials or an assigned service
weapon. The undercover agent has a
handler for communicating needs and concerns during the operation. Hiding that
contact adds additional stress. Living in the criminal world also creates
opportunities to engage in illegal activities. Any of those must be approved in
advance (like a planned bank robbery) as necessary to maintain the undercover agent’s identity and gather
data.
However, police officers can NEVER use drugs (for a raft of
reasons), and that is one way you see fiction writers revealing the undercover officer as a plant. It is a
myth that the agent must admit to being a police officer if asked by suspects
outright. Some undercover agents
play on the myth by saying, “Nah. I’m not a cop and, you’re right. If I were,
I’d have to tell you.”
Undercover
carries with it a cachet of danger. Why else hide in plain sight within a
possible criminal group? People who study these things say there are two main
dangers: keeping the undercover
identity secure and going back to real life after the operation ends.
An FBI agent told us in a session that it is very difficult
to reintegrate. Many officers enjoy the thrill of being undercover and find normal police work not nearly so stimulating.
Some officer’s marriages break up. Some turn to alcohol or drugs. It is hard to
switch off an identity that you worked hard to develop and maintain. When one
has been so secretive, it’s hard to open up and share again. Being an undercover agent is generally
recognized as being one of the most stressful positions to engage in.
Whereas local undercover
operations typically last no more than a few months, federal operations might
last years. On the Internet, there are lots of stories on being an undercover agent. Reading them could
give you a feel for the life if you are writing those scenes in your book.
The Use of Force by a
law enforcement officer involves physical restraint to get control of a
situation or an out-of-control person. Generally speaking, use of force is “the amount of effort required by police to compel
compliance by an unwilling subject” (as defined by International
Association of the Chiefs of Police, Police
Use of Force in America, 2001). But a 1999 Bureau of Justice Statistics report found that of 44 million
police contacts, less than one-half percent resulted in use of force. But the ones that make the news make use of force sound endemic. And those
darn TV shows …
How much force to use
and when to use force is left to
department training. One can imagine the inconsistencies with that approach, but
defining specific guidelines is tricky.
With the “split second syndrome”, even officers who don’t
normally use force might, under
pressure, resort to it in specific, high-tension situations. The National
Institute of Justice LINK
http://www.nij.gov/topics/law-enforcement/officer-safety/use-of-force/pages/welcome.aspx
recognizes that since situations vary, it is difficult to
come up with a uniform set of guidelines. They also recognize that the use of excessive force is sometimes
“difficult to estimate”.
As you know from listening to the news and reading
periodicals, that definition is often called into dispute in situations
requiring use of force. Thus, the
call for body cams on officers to document situations is on the rise. This
strategy is intended to protect all parties, because just as some officers use too much force, so do some suspects
unjustly cry excessive use of force.
Interestingly, officers with some college education are less
likely to use force. Whereas the
amount of experience the officer has shows inconsistencies among studies as to
the effect on use of force. Studies
find neither age, gender, race, class or other demographics is a factor in use of force.
The kinds of use of
force are:
1) Presence
of an officer (as a brake on activity)
2) Verbally
commanding a subject to comply
3) Empty
hand control to search, disarm, or control the suspect
4) Intermediate
weapon use includes electronic, impact, or other non-lethal weapons
5) Deadly
force is using force that can result in death or permanent injury
It is incumbent upon a professional mystery or crime writer
to properly depict activities in the performance of an officer’s duties.
Mort sets Frieda straight in "The List".
“Uh, yes,
I would.,” Mort responded. “Haven’t you been listening?” There was a long pause
before Mort lifted his head. “Yes, Frieda or Fran or whoever the hell you are.
I would be better off without you. In fact, I’ve really been ‘without you’ for
a lot of years. I just want to make it official.”
Frieda
stared at him, appalled at the implications. She narrowed her eyes. “I’ll sue you
for every penny you have or will ever make,” she spat out venomously. “I’ll sue
you for ruining my professional career. Who would take advice from a woman who
can’t hang onto her own husband? You can’t do this to me, Mort! I won’t let you
ruin me!”
“Do
whatever you have to do, Frieda,” Mort muttered, leaning wearily into the
lounge seat beneath him. “Whatever.” He opened his eyes, swung his feet to the
side, and lifted his body from the chair.
Hi there - I've seen some shows where the 'plant' is figured out. It's usually not pretty.
ReplyDelete@dino0726 from
FictionZeal - Impartial, Straighforward Fiction Book Reviews
Right, Diane. The bad guys don't take well to being tricked. I cannot even imagine me doing uncover--not for me! But I am grateful some are willing.
ReplyDeleteI knew a officer that was working undercover. It was so odd, I had to pretend I didn't know him, and even act as if I wouldn't be around him... (It was a little easier, since he looked like he was a really scuzzy Biker Dude.) I am really enjoying your serial story, too!
ReplyDeleteCat
That must have been an odd experience for you, Cat. Can you use it somehow in a book? Your first hand knowledge would be a real benefit. Thanks for enjoying the story, too! Writers like feedback!
DeleteFascinating to learn that the first official undercover agents were used in France in 1811--I'd guess that you're speculation that there were less formal uses before that.
ReplyDeleteRe: use of force, it's going to be very interesting going forward to see what kind of impact those body cams have.
Hi, Kern--Thanks for stopping in to read and comment. This has been a very fun series to work on. I've learned a lot! I agree the body cams phase could move us forward or create new difficulties. I am eager to follow the progress.
DeleteJust stopped by on my tour of A to Z blogs. Not undercover, completely open! Well-researched post. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteThanks for coming by and taking time to comment. I've had fun finding out stuff that I think my readers would like to know. I'd love to visit your posts, too. Please share your link.
Delete