A killer is not
necessarily a murderer. They are not synonyms. All murderers are killers, but not all killers are murderers. The law
recognizes that and so distinguishes among killers
as to intent and violence. Beheading someone is not inadvertent. Shooting
someone with a gun might be. A quick death versus one that involves torture
also figures into determining the degree to which to prosecute the killer.
One can kill with
a car accidentally or purposefully. The burden of proof is on the prosecution
to show both intent and viciousness if going for first degree murder of the killer. In fact, killing someone could
be classed as voluntary or involuntary manslaughter. The person is still dead,
killed in fact, but intent distinguishes manslaughter from murder.
A killer charged
with first degree murder is believed to have killed in a premeditated manner, willfully and “with malice
aforethought”. Felonius killings/murders are typically first
degree. In Mission Impastable, my felon was trying for a charge of
involuntary manslaughter. He was charged with first degree murder, but he is
trying to overturn that verdict in book two.
Here are the capsule descriptions your killers could be charged with:
First-degree murder,
as stated above is premeditated, willful, and malicious.
Second-degree murder
is intentional and malicious but is unpremeditated.
Third-degree murder,
also called voluntary manslaughter, is intentional but with no prior intent.
“Crimes of passion” fall into third-degree murder charges. Circumstances
conspired to lead the person to act impulsively, emotionally, and in a mentally
disturbed manner that resulted in someone’s death.
Involuntary
manslaughter is killing someone without an intention to kill, but involves
some negligent or intentional act that resulted in death. Driving while under
the influence is one example of involuntary manslaughter. Not securing a gun so
that a child kills himself accidentally could result in involuntary
manslaughter charges against the gun owner.
Having said all that, individual states have somewhat
different definitions. For example, how accomplices are charged can vary. Check
the definitions for these killers
for your setting.
When plotting your mystery or crime fiction, charge your killer with the correct crime or people
in the know should and will call you on it.
Kidnap is an
interesting word. The etymology for kidnap
dates to the late 17th century. Kid
of course means a young person; nap
is slang for nab, meaning to seize or
steal.
If the victim is transported across state lines, kidnapping is a federal crime. This
change occurred after the Lindbergh kidnapping
in the 1930s because it was so high profile. Kidnapping is one of the indictable
crimes.
Kidnapping
includes both the unlawful taking and removal of a person for felonious
purposes (extortion, use as hostage, human trafficking, or in commission of a
crime) or by a non-custodial parent wanting his or her child. These two types
of kidnapping are sometimes dealt with differently under
the law due to circumstances triggering the different motivations for the kidnapping.
Kidnapping is a
viable crime for your mystery. There is always the possibility of things going
not as planned, and the angst of a child away from familiar surroundings creates
good tension in your story. I used a short-term kidnapping scenario in Mission
Impastable to escalate the stakes for my amateur sleuth.
Part 11 of “The List” gives Mort’s rationale for a gift.
Kissing her fingers, he replied. “It do, it do indeed, Miss Frieda. You
are looking at your new car—fully loaded and completely paid for. I wanted to
make sure you have reliable transportation. That old BMW of yours had to go, so
I traded it in for this one.”
Frieda
smiled a tight little smile. “So you just went and picked me out another car
without even consulting me? You just decided I needed to dump my perfectly fine
car? How thoughtful. As usual!”
I hadn't thought about charges and what they would be in a killing. I often start my book with a murder but never get into the charges. Interesting. Thanks for a good post!!!
ReplyDeleteThanks for stopping in again, Monti. Yeah, it gets pretty interesting. The law parses and dices and slices. I just want to be accurate if I mention charges. Somebody will notice if I'm not! lol
DeleteThat was a very interesting read. I sure thought all killers were murderers. Fascinating!
ReplyDeleteThanks for coming by, Chrys. I surely enjoyed your blog as well. I have had a lot of fun writing this series. As a result, I hope I do an even better job of communicating the crimes in my books.
DeleteThanks for the info.
ReplyDeleteYou are so welcome. Thank you for coming by. I am really enjoying your word posts this month!
Delete