This post is a day early because I have a guest scheduled tomorrow and I wanted the day to be hers. And, it IS Tuesday somewhere in the world already. So, early L and a great guest post awaits you tomorrow! Yay! I'll bring you M on Wednesday as scheduled.
Larceny is a
common-law property crime. Larceny
is the unlawful taking of another’s personal property with the intent of
permanently depriving the owner of it. Usually it is a non-violent crime.
To be classed as larceny,
there are three factors that must be met: the intent must be felonious, the
intent is for the property to be appropriated for personal use, and the
property must be taken from another’s possession (without the will of the owner),
not just found and appropriated.
Larceny involves
personal property, so unlawful taking of real estate wouldn’t fit the
definition. Picking an apple off a tree is not larceny, but under some circumstances, taking an apple from that
tree which is on the ground, might be classed as larceny. And larceny
involves any degree of removal, even if the item is dropped back into the
owner’s lap.
The value of the stolen property determines whether the
theft is grand or petty larceny.
Each state sets the amount distinguishing grand and petty larcenies.
If you are including larceny
as a crime in your book, carefully read up the legal implications for your
setting. This is a trickier crime than it appears at first glance.
A police Lineup (British:
Identity Parade) is a cast of suspects or others displayed to witnesses for
identification purposes. The witness’s putative identification must be
confirmed to a level for presenting the lineup
identification as evidence in court proceedings. It is believed that showing
several possibilities to witnesses, while demanding more of memory, is more
likely to lead to more accurate identification.
The constitutional protection against self-incrimination
does not apply to lineups. One may
be compelled to appear in a lineup.
Police lineups conducted prior to
charging someone with a crime or indictment are not required to allow counsel
to be present. As you might imagine, how the lineup was conducted could jeopardize the state’s case on several
fronts. I’m sure you can see several scenario possibilities for your crime and
criminal.
The Innocence Project claims that eyewitness
misidentification accounts for 72% of convictions overturned by DNA evidence.
Police know the concerns and try very hard to ensure the objectivity of lineups.
To be admissible, the lineup
must be conducted fairly. Police are barred from saying or doing anything to
influence the identification. Ways to keep the lineup fair include: using officers who don’t know the identity of
the suspect, excluding people who look nothing like the description, using
foils who fit the profile, using people of similar height/complexion/build,
everyone standing side by side and showing frontal and profile views, using a
“six pack” (photo array), and video recordings of suspects mixed with
volunteers. Some departments are using sequential photo arrays (one at a time)
rather than simultaneous (six photos at a time) as a way to ensure more
accuracy. Interestingly, telling witnesses they don’t need to choose one of the
lineup, leads to fewer false
identifications.
Often the physical lineup
happens in a space like we see on TV (darkened room with one-way mirror,
suspects lined up with height markers behind them), but not always. The rooms
can vary. In a “show up”, only one suspect is shown to the witness.
In your story, you may want to show a lineup scene. Check with your local police to find out what they
use so you can be accurate for your locale.
Read more of “The List” in part 12. In this scene, Mort and Frieda disagree about Mort's intent.
“Listen,”
Mort responded, “that heap lived a
lot longer than I thought it would. It’s almost as old as that typewriter you
won’t replace. I just did for you what you wouldn’t do. You need a good car.”
“And
why is that? We hardly ever use my car in the city. I use a car service if you
can’t take me to a book signing or a speech. I can’t remember when I last
drove.”
“Well,
that might change. You need to be prepared.”
“So
you just took it on yourself to make that decision. Typical of you! You always
have to be in control, don’t you? You know what’s best for me. Go to some
godforsaken edge of the world for a week. Get a new car. What’s next? What else
have you shifted in my perfectly ordered world?”
I read most of this. Some of the sections I scanned over. A lot of valuable information. I remember over 10 years ago hearing you at the Fresno SinC talk about working with a son-in-law who was a police officer to help you in your writing. You certainly have homed in (or is honed) your knowledge of police and law terms well. It's so easy to use the wrong term; i.e., I'll have to check online to check again if I used "homed in" correctly & also "i.e."
ReplyDeleteHi, Linda! I'm flattered I remind you of someone, but I've never addressed the Fresno SinC group (that would be fun to do, however). I'm glad you found some useful stuff here. This has been a fun series to work on. I know I write too much, but I get so carried away with my topics. I hope you'll be back.
ReplyDelete